Hello everybody, this is George Harvey (aka The Autistic Blogger). I’d like to apologise for the slight delay in uploading this post. I’m busy working on a major project for my 6th Anniversary – which, admittedly, was two months ago. I don’t know how long it’ll take me to finish and post. But trust me when I say it’ll be worth the wait. In the meantime here’s a review of something I’ve gotten into reading lately. This post will also be made available on Autistic Blogger Creates (https://autisticbloggercreates.wordpress.com/blog/), which I pray I’ll adding more content to soon.
***
One of the oldest and most efficient tools a writer has is the ‘What If…?’ scenario. When coming up with ideas for a story, we usually ask ourselves how things would turn out if specific circumstances occurred. For example, what if an alien came to Earth and needed a boy’s help to get home? What if dinosaurs came back to life in the modern day? What if Peter Pan eventually did grow up? These questions – along with the directorial skills of Steven Spielberg – lead to such cinematic classics as E.T. (1982), Jurassic Park (1993) and Hook (1991). The same can be applied to novels. And in the mid-2010s, a group of devoted authors took the ‘What If…?’ concept and used it to craft a series of Twisted Tales based on the animated Walt Disney films. Including this one, released in 2015: So This is Love.
It’s the tale of Cinderella, who, after a magical evening of attending the royal ball, is locked in her room by her evil stepmother. Unfortunately (unlike the movie), no one comes to her rescue, and she misses her chance to try on the glass slipper. Later on, when Lady Tremaine’s cruelty reaches new highs, Cinderella escapes her home and gets a job in the palace as a seamstress. But with no way of proving she’s the missing princess, she considers forgetting about the prince and looking for a new path to happiness, especially as she now doubts if his love for her was even real.
One thing I appreciate about this story is it doesn’t waste time rehashing the movie. The first chapter begins with Cinderella arriving at the ball, there are some additional scenes and dialogue between her and the prince, and the new plot starts partway through the second chapter. The author knows her audience is keen to experience her fresh take on the story, so she only focuses on the most pivotal scenes from the film. As for the twist itself, it’s implemented so seamlessly you’d think it was always meant to be part of the narrative. The mice just don’t show up with the key. It’s so simple yet makes all the difference in how the story plays out. The author is passionate about the original movie, but she understands her readers want more than nostalgia.
It’s not just the plot that’s been twisted, however. As the series is intended for older audiences, it only makes sense to give the story a more mature tone. One way it does that is by adding in many darker elements to reflect the time period. These include war, poverty, executions, and even slave trading. Things don’t get as gruesome as the Brothers Grimm version – although the author does sneak in a clever reference to it: “a girl might cut off her toes simply to fit the glass slipper” (Ch.14, p.168). Another way it reinforces the tone is by removing the comic reliefs. The mice are referenced sporadically throughout the story (e.g. Ch.2, p.19), but it’s clear they don’t play any role here. It’s even possible they don’t talk in this version, and Cinderella only imagined they could. It’s more believable that way and changes our perception of the Disney film.
Speaking of believability, I give the author credit that she tries to makes sense of everything she’s writing. She even goes so far as patching up minor issues with the original fairytale. One of the most prominent examples is how many characters, including Cinderella herself, question the logic of love-at-first-sight. They think she was just emotionally drawn to the first kind person she’d met in years. Or maybe the prince is just “in love with the idea of her” (Ch.19, p.214). Other potential issues are covered as well, such as the fairy godmother’s magic. She explains how her powers are limited, which is why she could only give Cinderella until midnight at the ball and why she can’t fix her current state of affairs (Ch.5, pp.47-8).
Perhaps most definitively, though, Cinderella expresses why she’s never left her stepfamily until now (Ch.2, p.22). The reality is most people who experience cruel upbringings tend to fear running away. True, she wouldn’t have to deal with her stepmother’s torment anymore. But then what? She doesn’t know anyone or anything outside her family home; she would have no way of supporting herself or keeping a roof over her head. Plus, this isn’t exactly a time when helping the poor and homeless was considered a priority. She’d most likely either starve to death or be forced to return. So for anyone who claims Cinderella not leaving sooner is a plot-hole, this realistic approach to the story proves, conclusively, that it’s not.
However, this isn’t to say there aren’t any drawbacks to all this realism. For example, I’ve yet to mention the story has a second plot: one that involves a conspiracy to remove the king and prince from power. As such, there’s lots of political speak regarding things like taxes, alliances, and giving support to the commoners. I’ll admit it’s all well-researched on the author’s part. But it does draw on and on to the point of feeling generic – as if they couldn’t think of a better way to pad out the narrative.
Additionally, the author decided to give the king, prince, fairy godmother, and grand duke proper names. Which is perfectly reasonable, but it also feels unnecessary. Not to mention names like George, Charles and Philip will only make readers think of the British royal family.
Regardless, the author seems determined to give every character a background. Because, let’s face it, as charming as they were in the movie, you could describe most of their personalities as one-dimensional. Fortunately, the author adds just enough to their characters to make them feel like real people.
Starting with Cinderella, she’s more forward-thinking here. She doesn’t just endure terrible treatment and wait for her dreams to come true; she stands up for herself when the situation calls for it (e.g. Ch.4). Plus, she plans to build a better life for herself when all hope seems lost with the prince (e.g. Ch.10. p.113). Seeing her take these actions, and make the most of her situation, presents her as more of an inspiring protagonist.
Another fleshed-out character is the fairy godmother. Her backstory reveals she’s the victim of a terrible law that’s put her life in danger (Ch.19, pp.221-3). She was once close friends with Cinderella’s grandmother – and even became her daughter’s godmother – but was forced to run away. It’s mainly due to her absence that Cinderella suffered for many years, and she’s never forgiven herself. Seeing this kind-hearted, whimsical fairy so vulnerable and grief-stricken makes her more human to us.
As for the prince – who had practically no character in the movie – he’s arguably made the best improvement of all. Unlike the rest of his family, he’s experienced life outside the palace and witnessed first-hand the terrible state his people are in. This knowledge motivates him to be more involved with the council and fix the problems so many have turned a blind eye towards. Admittedly, it sounds cliched. But at least it gives us a reason to respect him. Additionally, the narrative occasionally switches to his perspective, which strengthens his personality by showing us the different relationships with his father, the grand duke and the “mystery maiden” (Ch.10, p.119). In the latter case, we’re shown why Cinderella is so important to him and reassures us he loves the person she is, not the spectacle she was (e.g. Ch.10, p.120).
Even Lady Tremaine has depth added to her character. In one of the earlier chapters, we hear all about her troubled life before marrying Cinderella’s father. And how some poor choice of words ignited her immediate hatred of the girl (Ch.4, pp.37-41). It doesn’t redeem her character in any way, but it does give us a better understanding of her mindset. She felt a need to be hard on Cinderella for reasons other than lack of blood relation.
There is, however, one character whose additional depth feels more harmful to them. Without spoiling who it is, this person is given a more villainous role in the story – not unlike King Stefan in Disney’s Maleficent (2014). I can understand the plot needing something extra to keep readers engaged. But considering how good-natured this person was in the film, the idea of them having sinister motives feels too forced. The story does follow the movie’s continuity until Chapter 2, after all.
Honestly, it would’ve made better sense to create a new character for the villain role. Considering the author introduces new ones to advance the plot. Some of the more notable additions include Louisa and Madame Irmina (Cinderella’s new friend and boss, respectively). But the one who stands out the most is the king’s sister, Duchess Genevieve. Initially, she seems like another obstacle for Cinderella to overcome. She’s notoriously hard to please and generally makes life miserable for her servants (e.g. Ch.8, p.88). But after a while, she warms up to Cinderella and becomes more sympathetic when hearing about her past. She even manages to afford her some privileges (Ch.11). Also, like the prince, her personality is strengthened by her various relationships with other people. Whether it’s being scornful of her brother, hateful towards the grand duke, or having views of her own about her nephew’s “mystery maiden“, she’s a strong-minded woman who never hesitates to challenge somebody in authority. Her presence does take some getting used to, but she’s an integral part of the story and the middle ground between many characters.
In conclusion, So This is Love reimagines Disney’s Cinderella in a way that’s both respectful of the film and its audience. It may not be the first attempt at retelling the classic, and there might be some inspirations taken from A Twist in Time (2007) and Cinderella (2017). But with the way it treats its readers like adults, giving them a realistic world, with fleshed-out characters and motivations, it’s an engaging read that makes you question if they’ll be a happy ending. If you grew up with the original Disney film and want to fall in love with these characters again, this book is highly recommended – along with the rest of Twisted Tales.
That’s all I have to say for this review. So until next time, stay tuned.
Ref: Elizabeth Lim, So This is Love (Sywell, UK, Autumn Publishing, 2020).
Image courtesy of https://books.disney.com/book/so-this-is-love/